On Saturday 29th Jan went to an afternoon talk by Dr Sue Berry at the Brighton and Hove Archaeological Society’s Local History Group meeting near George Street, Hove. Very engaging – I made pages of notes – but just an outine here. The talk was on Brighton during the 16th and 17th centuries. At the beginning of the 16th century the whole of the Brighton area, from Portslade to Rottingdean, and up to the top of the Downs was sheep and cereal with a handful of villages (Brighton, Portslade, Falmer and Rottingdean) and some smaller hamlets such as Preston, Hangleton and Hove.
Excess population was sent away from the farming villages, and the only place to go was Brighton, which had the undesireable and dangerous trade of fishing available to the poor and dispossessed. Farmers saw extra people to their needs as a threat, and a financial burden, so best be rid of them. And they were increasingly got rid of as gentlemen farmers began to buy and build estates for their hunting and leisure activities.
Benfield House was one of the first, built by a wealthy Wealden family to serve as a hunting lodge. The house was demolished in the 19th century. The Bellinghams Courtiers from the North of England, bought and demolished Hangleton Old Manor (beside the church) and built Hangleton Place, but had to sell in 1599, when they fell out of favour with the Crown. It was bought by the Wests, later the Sackville-Wests.
Patcham Place was new in 1530-50, and some of it exists within the existing built fabric (probably). It was the heart of a 1000 acre estate in the mid 17th century.
Preston Place (now Manor) was first built c1617, but was completely rebuilt by a family called Western to its current plan. That family owned lots of land on the west side of town and gave their name to Western Road, honest.
This new breed of landowner had income from elsewhere, often the Court, and so farming was not for a living, more a gentlemans pleasure, and exta peasants spoiling the hunt had to go. Thus Brighton, and its fishing industry grew.
Brighton soon had a bigger fleet than Hastings, although both communities did their fishing in the North Sea. Each open, shallow, tublike boat set out with a crew of 8 sharefishermen, and sailed round to Scarborough for cod in the summer and Yarmouth for herring in the autumn and early winter.
Brighton soon had a population of 3500, of which only about 100 families were in farming. 1660 saw 600 masters and men in fishing in Brighton. In addition the east side , near the Steyne, was home to hemp retting (a smelly process of controlled rotting of hemp stems to release rope fibres), and the front had rope winding machinery for making ropes and the basics of nets for the fishing trade.
But then more changes. The big shingle beach where the nethouses stood, and boats could be safely pulled up away from storms, was gradually lost. At the same time Dutch fishermen did a better commercial job, with bigger boats and better quality control they took much of the market, so fishing was shrinking. By the late 17th century the population of Brighton was down to 2000.
The fishermen may have tried coastal tramping, sailing from port to port seeking a cargo, but many went into the navy, either Royal or merchant.
The town stayed poor and unpopular until the growth of Tourism in the mid-18th century.
I hope I have found the core of what Sue Berry said. You’ll be able to check when the book comes out in 2013.
-
Recent Posts
Archives
- March 2024
- January 2024
- November 2023
- October 2023
- September 2023
- May 2023
- April 2023
- March 2023
- February 2023
- October 2022
- September 2022
- August 2022
- July 2022
- June 2022
- March 2022
- January 2022
- October 2021
- September 2021
- August 2021
- April 2021
- January 2021
- December 2020
- October 2020
- July 2020
- June 2020
- May 2020
- February 2020
- January 2020
- December 2019
- November 2019
- August 2019
- June 2019
- April 2019
- February 2019
- January 2019
- December 2018
- November 2018
- October 2018
- September 2018
- August 2018
- July 2018
- June 2018
- May 2018
- April 2018
- March 2018
- February 2018
- January 2018
- December 2017
- November 2017
- October 2017
- September 2017
- August 2017
- July 2017
- June 2017
- May 2017
- April 2017
- March 2017
- February 2017
- January 2017
- December 2016
- November 2016
- October 2016
- September 2016
- August 2016
- July 2016
- June 2016
- May 2016
- April 2016
- March 2016
- February 2016
- January 2016
- December 2015
- November 2015
- October 2015
- September 2015
- August 2015
- July 2015
- June 2015
- May 2015
- April 2015
- March 2015
- February 2015
- January 2015
- December 2014
- November 2014
- October 2014
- September 2014
- August 2014
- July 2014
- June 2014
- May 2014
- April 2014
- March 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014
- December 2013
- November 2013
- October 2013
- September 2013
- August 2013
- July 2013
- June 2013
- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
Categories
Meta
-
Join 90 other subscribers
Ah, Sue Berry. I like her a lot, and see quite a lot of her, since she lives in Lewes and we both use the Brighton History Library a lot. I refer to her fabulous book on Georgian Brighton a lot and recommend it to my students. It always seems to be available at Sandpiper in Kensington Gardens for a mere £7. Total bargain. Really looking forward to her new book. Alexandra
Thanks for the review of this talk. I had this penciled in (my mind not my diary) to go along but completely forgot about it until the 30th! So cross with myself. Anyway I am grateful for your notes -sounds fascinating.